**1. Distinguish membership from nesting:** The required element is the set \(\{2\}\), not the number 2 or the set \(\{\{2\}\}\). Examine the elements directly inside each outermost pair of braces.
**2. Identify the sets:** B, C and D each list \(\{2\}\) as a direct element. A contains only 2; E contains only \(\{\{2\}\}\).
**Answer: B, C, D — Sets B, C and D contain \(\{2\}\).**
A: **Incorrect:** Its sole element is 2, not \(\{2\}\).
B: **Correct:** It directly lists \(\{2\}\) alongside 2.
C: **Correct:** It directly lists \(\{2\}\) alongside \(\{\{2\}\}\).
D: **Correct:** Its first direct element is \(\{2\}\).
E: **Incorrect:** Its sole direct element is \(\{\{2\}\}\), one nesting level deeper.
**1. Identify the elements:** \(\{\varnothing\}\) has exactly one element, the empty set. Thus \(\varnothing\in\{\varnothing\}\), but \(\{\varnothing\}\notin\{\varnothing\}\).
**2. Check subsets and deeper nesting:** The empty set is a proper subset of every nonempty set. Also \(\{\varnothing\}\subset\{\varnothing,\{\varnothing\}\}\). In \(\{\{\varnothing\}\}\), the sole element is \(\{\varnothing\}\), not \(\varnothing\).
**Answer: A, C, D — A, C and D.**
A: **Correct:** The empty set is the sole element of \(\{\varnothing\}\).
B: **Incorrect:** The sole element is \(\varnothing\), not its singleton.
C: **Correct:** The empty set is properly contained in the nonempty singleton.
D: **Correct:** Its only element is present on the right, which also has an additional element.
E: **Incorrect:** The outer singleton contains \(\{\varnothing\}\), not \(\varnothing\).
**1. Check inclusions:** Adding C to a union cannot remove elements, so \(A\cup B\subseteq A\cup B\cup C\). Adding C to an intersection can remove elements, so the proposed reverse inclusion is not universal.
**2. Simplify the partition:** \[(A\cap B)\cup(A\cap\overline B)=A\cap(B\cup\overline B)=A.\] The result need not equal B.
**Answer: A, C — A and C.**
A: **Correct:** Adding another set to a union preserves every existing member.
B: **Incorrect:** The universal inclusion goes the other way; take \(A=B=\{1\}\), \(C=\varnothing\).
C: **Correct:** The two parts partition A according to membership in B.
D: **Incorrect:** The expression equals A and need not equal B.
is true.
We prove the above statement using the following sequence of arguments.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Which statement/s of the above argument is/are erroneous?
6406537045852.
Step 3
6406537045853.
Step 4
6406537045854.
Step 5
6406537045855.
Step 6
6406537045856.
Step 7
Published solution
**1. Identify the unsupported choices:** From \(P(c)\lor Q(c)\), neither \(P(c)\) alone in step 3 nor \(Q(c)\) alone in step 5 follows. Those invalid choices also invalidate the universal claims in steps 4 and 6.
**2. Check the last inference:** If either universal claim were established, disjunction introduction would justify step 7. Its inference rule is valid, although the preceding proof has not established its premises.
**3. Disprove the original claim:** On domain \(\{1,2\}\), let P hold only at 1 and Q only at 2. Then \(\forall x(P(x)\lor Q(x))\) is true, while both \(\forall xP(x)\) and \(\forall xQ(x)\) are false.
**Answer: A, B, C, D — Steps 3, 4, 5 and 6.**
A: **Correct:** Erroneous: a disjunction does not imply its first disjunct.
B: **Correct:** Erroneous as part of this proof: its required arbitrary-instance premise was not established.
C: **Correct:** Erroneous: a disjunction does not imply its second disjunct.
D: **Correct:** Erroneous as part of this proof: it generalizes an unsupported premise.
E: **Incorrect:** Not selected: disjunction introduction itself is valid if a universal premise is available.
Sometimes the number of times that an element occurs in an unordered collection matters.
**Multisets** are unordered collections of elements where an element can occur as a member more
than once. The notation
denotes the multiset with element
occurring
times, element
occurring
times, and so on. The numbers
are called the multiplicities of
.
Let
and
be multisets. The union of the multisets
and
, denoted as
, is the multiset
where the multiplicity of an element is the maximum of its multiplicities in
and
. Similarly, the
intersection of the multisets
and
, denoted as
, is the multiset where the multiplicity of
an element is the minimum of its multiplicities in
and
.
Consider the multisets
and
.
Answer the given subquestions with respect to the same.
What is the multiplicity of
in
?
Published solution
**1. Read the multiplicities:** In \(P=\{3\cdot a,2\cdot b,1\cdot c\}\), b has multiplicity 2; in \(Q=\{2\cdot a,3\cdot b,4\cdot d\}\), it has multiplicity 3.
**2. Apply intersection:** \(m_{P\cap Q}(b)=\min(2,3)=2\).
**Answer: 2.**
Sometimes the number of times that an element occurs in an unordered collection matters.
**Multisets** are unordered collections of elements where an element can occur as a member more
than once. The notation
denotes the multiset with element
occurring
times, element
occurring
times, and so on. The numbers
are called the multiplicities of
.
Let
and
be multisets. The union of the multisets
and
, denoted as
, is the multiset
where the multiplicity of an element is the maximum of its multiplicities in
and
. Similarly, the
intersection of the multisets
and
, denoted as
, is the multiset where the multiplicity of
an element is the minimum of its multiplicities in
and
.
Consider the multisets
and
.
Answer the given subquestions with respect to the same.
What is the multiplicity of
in
?
Published solution
**1. Read the multiplicities:** d is absent from \(P=\{3\cdot a,2\cdot b,1\cdot c\}\), so its multiplicity is 0. In \(Q=\{2\cdot a,3\cdot b,4\cdot d\}\), it is 4.
**2. Apply union:** \(m_{P\cup Q}(d)=\max(0,4)=4\).
**Answer: 4.**
is the set of all non-negative integers.
Consider the following inductive proof to prove
.
Proof:
Basis: _________________
Inductive step:
Let
is true. Then
.
So,
= (I) _____________= (II) _____________=
=
Answer the given subquestions with respect to the same.
What value of
should be used to prove the Basis?
Published solution
**1. Choose the first index:** The domain consists of all nonnegative integers, so the induction basis is n=0.
**2. Verify the identity:** The left side is \(1^2=1\); the right side is \((0+1)(2(0)+1)(2(0)+3)/3=1\).
**Answer: 0.**
is the set of all non-negative integers.
Consider the following inductive proof to prove
.
Proof:
Basis: _________________
Inductive step:
Let
is true. Then
.
So,
= (I) _____________= (II) _____________=
=
Answer the given subquestions with respect to the same.
Which of the following options correctly represent the statements that can be filled at (I) and (II) so
that the proof will be correct?
6406537045863.
(I)
,
(II)
6406537045864.
(I)
,
(II)
6406537045865.
(I)
,
(II)
6406537045866.
(I)
,
(II)
Published solution
**1. Apply the inductive hypothesis:** Replace the sum through \((2k+1)^2\) with \((k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)/3\), retaining the new term \((2k+3)^2\). Thus \[\text{(I)}=\frac{(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)}3+(2k+3)^2.\]
**2. Factor the common term:** \[\text{(II)}=(2k+3)\left[\frac{(k+1)(2k+1)}3+(2k+3)\right].\]
**3. Finish the step:** Combining the bracket gives \((2k^2+9k+10)/3=(2k+5)(k+2)/3\), which is the required formula at k+1.
**Answer: C — The substitution and factorization in option C.**
A: **Incorrect:** Its first blank omits the added square.
B: **Incorrect:** Its first blank omits the added square and its second has an incorrect denominator distribution.
C: **Correct:** It retains the square and factors the common term correctly.
D: **Incorrect:** The displayed blanks reverse the substitution and factoring order.
**1. Remove the outer implication:** Write \(F=(\neg p\Rightarrow q)\Rightarrow(p\Leftrightarrow\neg q)\). Its antecedent is \(p\lor q\), so \[F\equiv\neg(p\lor q)\lor[(p\land\neg q)\lor(\neg p\land q)].\]
**2. Simplify:** This is true at (p,q)=(F,F),(T,F),(F,T) and false only at (T,T). Hence \(F\equiv\neg p\lor\neg q\).
**Answer: D — \(\neg p\lor\neg q\).**
A: **Incorrect:** At p=q=true, \(p\lor q\) is true but F is false.
B: **Incorrect:** At p=false,q=true, \(p\lor\neg q\) is false but F is true.
C: **Incorrect:** At p=true,q=false, \(\neg p\lor q\) is false but F is true.
D: **Correct:** It is false exactly when both p and q are true.
Consider the following proposition and answer the given subquestions based on this proposition.
Which of the following propositions is a conjunctive normal form (CNF) of the given proposition?
6406537045871.6406537045872.6406537045873.
Published solution
**1. Simplify the proposition:** The original implication is false only when p and q are both true, so it equals \(\neg p\lor\neg q\).
**2. Check CNF syntax:** A CNF is a conjunction of clauses, each a disjunction of literals. \[(\neg p\lor p)\land(\neg p\lor\neg q)\] is CNF; its first clause is a tautology, so the expression remains equivalent to the original.
**Answer: C — \((\neg p\lor p)\land(\neg p\lor\neg q)\).**
A: **Incorrect:** It is equivalent but has a negated compound and nested conjunctions rather than CNF syntax.
B: **Incorrect:** It is an OR of conjunctions, hence DNF rather than CNF.
C: **Correct:** It is an AND of literal-disjunction clauses and is equivalent.
Consider the following proposition and answer the given subquestions based on this proposition.
Which of the following propositions is a disjunctive normal form (DNF) of the given proposition?
6406537045874.6406537045875.6406537045876.
Published solution
**1. Identify satisfying assignments:** The proposition is true at (F,F),(T,F),(F,T).
**2. Form the DNF minterms:** \[(\neg p\land\neg q)\lor(p\land\neg q)\lor(\neg p\land q).\] Each term describes one satisfying assignment, and their disjunction is a DNF.
**Answer: B — \((\neg p\land\neg q)\lor(p\land\neg q)\lor(\neg p\land q)\).**
A: **Incorrect:** Its first term negates a compound disjunction; it is not in DNF until De Morgan’s law is applied.
B: **Correct:** It is the disjunction of the three satisfying minterms.
C: **Incorrect:** It is an AND of clauses, so it is CNF rather than DNF.
are constants.
Determine under which of the following conditions it is true that
.
6406537045847.6406537045848.
and
6406537045849.6406537045850.
or
6406537045851.
None of these
Published solution
**1. Compute both compositions:** \((f\circ g)(x)=a(cx+d)+b=acx+ad+b\), while \((g\circ f)(x)=c(ax+b)+d=acx+bc+d\).
**2. Compare constants:** Equality for every x holds exactly when \(ad+b=bc+d\). Identical functions, with a=c and b=d, satisfy this condition.
**3. Test weaker conditions:** Taking a=c=2,b=0,d=1 satisfies a=c but fails commutation. Taking a=1,b=1,c=2,d=2 satisfies ad=bc but still has unequal composition constants.
**Answer: A, B — \(ad+b=bc+d\); or identical functions a=c and b=d.**
A: **Correct:** This is the exact equality of the constant terms.
B: **Correct:** Identical functions always commute with themselves.
C: **Incorrect:** Equality of ad and bc alone omits the remaining b and d terms.
D: **Incorrect:** Either equality alone need not ensure equal composition constants.
E: **Incorrect:** A is necessary and sufficient, and B is sufficient.
**1. Check infinity:** The natural numbers are infinite but countable, disproving the first statement.
**2. Check closure:** Two countable sets can be enumerated by interleaving their lists and skipping repetitions, so their union is countable. Their intersection and set difference are subsets of a countable set and hence also countable.
**Answer: B, C, D — Union, intersection and set difference are countable.**
**Convention note:** “Countable” includes finite sets here, as is standard. An intersection or difference may be finite or empty.
A: **Incorrect:** The natural numbers give an infinite countable counterexample.
B: **Correct:** Interleaving enumerations lists the union.
C: **Correct:** The intersection is a subset of either countable set.
D: **Correct:** The difference is a subset of the first countable set.
Which of the following steps is wrong with this famous supposed "proof" that
?
Proof: We use the following steps, where
and
are two equal positive integers.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
6406537045857.
Step 3
6406537045858.
Step 4
6406537045859.
Step 5
6406537045860.
Step 6
6406537045861.
Step 7
Published solution
**1. Locate the cancellation:** Step 4 is \((a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b)\). Step 5 cancels a-b to claim a+b=b.
**2. Check the divisor:** Since a=b, \(a-b=0\). Cancelling that factor divides by zero and is invalid. The later steps use valid algebra on the already invalid result.
**Answer: C — Step 5.**
A: **Incorrect:** Subtracting b² from both sides is valid.
B: **Incorrect:** The factorization is valid.
C: **Correct:** It cancels the zero factor a−b.
D: **Incorrect:** Substituting a=b is valid; the error already occurred in step 5.
E: **Incorrect:** Dividing by positive b is valid; the earlier false premise caused the contradiction.
**1. Sum over j:** For fixed i, \[\sum_{j=0}^3(3i+2j)=4(3i)+2(0+1+2+3)=12i+12.\]
**2. Sum over i:** \(\sum_{i=0}^2(12i+12)=12(0+1+2)+3(12)=36+36=72\).
**Answer: 72.**
the set of all negative integers that are multiples of
and
the
set of all real numbers between
and
.
Determine which of these sets are countable.
6406537045878.
Both
and
are countable
6406537045879.
is countable but
is uncountable
6406537045880.
is countable but
is uncountable
6406537045881.
Both
and
are uncountable
Published solution
**1. Enumerate S1:** The negative multiples of 10 are \(-10,-20,-30,\ldots\), indexed by positive integers through n↦−10n. Thus S1 is countably infinite.
**2. Classify S2:** A nondegenerate real interval between 0 and 2 is uncountable, whether its endpoints are included or excluded.
**Answer: B — S1 countable; S2 uncountable.**
A: **Incorrect:** A real interval is uncountable.
B: **Correct:** The discrete multiples are enumerable, while the real interval is not.
C: **Incorrect:** This reverses the cardinality classifications.
D: **Incorrect:** The negative multiples are countable.
Answer the given subquestions with respect to the same.
Calculate
.
Enter the value as a single integer.
Published solution
**1. Compute the first value:** Starting with \(f(0)=3\), \(f(1)=2f(0)+3=2(3)+3=9\).
**2. Compute the requested value:** \(f(2)=2f(1)+3=2(9)+3=21\).
**Answer: 21.**