MauryaHub PYQ Practice

Design Thinking for Data-Driven App Development · Quiz 2 · May 2026

Design Thinking for Data-Driven App Development · Quiz 2 · May 2026

← Course papers · Start practice / exam

Questions and published explanations below are available without starting a test. Some questions may not have a published solution yet.

0 / 26 published solutions

Question 2 MCQ · 0.0 marks

**General Guidelines:** **(i) The question paper has multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that must be answered on the** **computer. Answer all the questions.** **(ii) The questions numbered 3 to 22 carry one mark each. Read the instructions carefully and** **choose the closest and correct option; there is only one right answer for each question.** **(iii) The questions numbered 23 to 27 are case study-based multiple-choice questions of two** **marks each. Read the instructions carefully and choose the closest and correct option; there** **is only one right answer for each question.** **(iv) All characters, relationships and events depicted in the questions or cases are fictitious.** **Any similarity to actual events or persons, living or dead, is coincidental.** **Please indicate that you have read and understood the guidelines by marking the** **appropriate box below:**
6406537123645.
I have read and understood the guidelines
6406537123646.
I have read the guidelines

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q2

Question 3 MCQ · 1.0 marks

According to the Four Noble Truths–Karmic Design Thinking mapping taught in the course, which concept corresponds to the Solve phase?
6406537123647.
Nirodha
6406537123648.
Samudaya
6406537123649.
Dukkha
6406537123650.
Marga

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q3

Question 4 MCQ · 1.0 marks

A university wants to understand why students repeatedly submit project reports late. From a design thinking perspective, which approach is most likely to uncover latent needs and contextual barriers?
6406537123651.
Ask faculty members to estimate why students submit late.
6406537123652.
Send students a closed-ended questionnaire to understand the root cause.
6406537123653.
Observe students preparing and submitting reports.
6406537123654.
Develop an automated reminder system and assess whether submission rates improve.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q4

Question 5 MCQ · 1.0 marks

A product team interviews only highly engaged users of its professional-learning platform. What is the most significant limitation of this research design?
6406537123655.
Experienced users are unable to describe product features accurately.
6406537123656.
The study may overlook barriers experienced by inactive users.
6406537123657.
Qualitative research cannot be conducted with engaged users.
6406537123658.
The interviews will necessarily produce statistically invalid findings.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q5

Question 6 MCQ · 1.0 marks

During project execution, a stakeholder asks the product development team to add a predictive analytics dashboard that was not included in the approved deliverables. This request primarily represents:
6406537123659.
A proposed change to project quality.
6406537123660.
A project planning requirement.
6406537123661.
A proposed change to project scope.
6406537123662.
A routine operational dependency.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q6

Question 7 MCQ · 1.0 marks

According to Don Norman’s principles in The Design of Everyday Things, an interface element like a button that visually looks pressable due to elevation and shadows is demonstrating a strong:
6406537123663.
Constraint
6406537123664.
Signifier
6406537123665.
Mapping
6406537123666.
Affordance

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q7

Question 8 MCQ · 1.0 marks

What is the primary indicator that a design team has successfully reached the core finding during a Multi-Why analysis?
6406537123667.
They have asked "Why?" multiple times and completed Conflict of interest mapping.
6406537123668.
They have asked "Why?" multiple times and constructed HMW statements.
6406537123669.
They have uncovered an underlying behavioral or systemic root cause.
6406537123670.
They have generated at least five potential feature ideas for the product roadmap.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q8

Question 9 MCQ · 1.0 marks

How do Agile and Design Thinking complement each other in product development? 1. Design Thinking focuses on understanding target customers, while Agile manages sprint cycles. 2. Design Thinking delivers features incrementally, and Agile generates features for customer research. 3. Design Thinking helps frame the problem; Agile supports iterative implementation. 4. Both are sequential frameworks that must be completed before testing. Select the correct option using the codes given below:
6406537123671.
1 and 3 only
6406537123672.
1, 3 and 4 only
6406537123673.
2, 3 and 4 only
6406537123674.
1, 2, 3 and 4

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q9

Question 10 MCQ · 1.0 marks

State whether the following statement is TRUE or FALSE: “In Design Thinking, the Test phase is meant solely to confirm whether the prototype works for the target customer and does not involve further modification of the Customer Journey Map.”
6406537123675.
TRUE
6406537123676.
FALSE

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q10

Question 11 MCQ · 1.0 marks

According to the Agile Manifesto, which of the following statements correctly reflect the core values of Agile methodology? 1. Individuals and interactions are valued more than processes and tools. 2. Working software is valued more than comprehensive documentation. 3. Following a fixed plan is valued more than responding to change. 4. Customer collaboration is valued more than contract negotiation. Select the correct option using the codes given below:
6406537123677.
1 and 2 only
6406537123678.
1, 2 and 3 only
6406537123679.
1, 2 and 4 only
6406537123680.
1, 2, 3 and 4

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q11

Question 12 MCQ · 1.0 marks

In the ENV model used for problem structuring, what does the ‘V’ component represent?
6406537123681.
The financial cost of developing the proposed solution
6406537123682.
The specific state or quality of an element
6406537123683.
The value of the product to end-users
6406537123684.
The viability of the desired result

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q12

Question 13 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Which activities represent appropriate practices in the Empathize phase in Karmic Design Thinking? 1. Attaching a camera to the head, lying on a stretcher and going through the emergency hospital admission process. 2. Sitting with patients in a general ward and interviewing them about their daily healthcare routines, experiences, and difficulties. 3. Writing an email to the Chief Medical Officer seeking permission to conduct a Design Thinking and Agile project in the hospital. 4. Shadowing nurses and caregivers during hospital activities and documenting their experiences across different touchpoints. Select the correct option using the codes given below:
6406537123685.
1, 2, and 3 only
6406537123686.
1, 2, and 4 only
6406537123687.
2, 3, and 4 only
6406537123688.
1, 2, 3, and 4 only

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q13

Question 14 MCQ · 1.0 marks

A team identifies a contradiction in a news application: IF we increase advertisement frequency, THEN ad revenue increases, BUT user retention drops significantly. Which of the following represents the most appropriate Desired Result statement to resolve this contradiction using the ENV framework?
6406537123689.
Eliminate all advertisements from the app to maximize user retention.
6406537123690.
Double the ad frequency to maximize immediate short-term revenue before users churn.
6406537123691.
Generate sustainable revenue without reducing user retention or disrupting the experience.
6406537123692.
Keep ad frequency constant and charge users a high mandatory subscription fee.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q14

Question 15 MCQ · 1.0 marks

During Customer Journey Mapping for a digital pharmacy app, a team identifies an "emotional valley" during the prescription approval phase due to unannounced delays. What is the most logical next step for the team before moving to the Analyze phase?
6406537123693.
Include this emotional valley as HMW question while brainstorming ideas to address them.
6406537123694.
Cluster this emotional valley with related context and list it as a problem to be analyzed.
6406537123695.
Immediately write backend automated script execution code for order approvals so that customers come out of the emotional valley.
6406537123696.
Apply multi-why analysis to analyze the prescription approval phase and delays.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q15

Question 16 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Which analytical justification best explains why Silent Brainstorming is often more effective than traditional verbal brainstorming during the Solve phase?
6406537123697.
It guarantees that only the lead's proposals are chosen for execution.
6406537123698.
It increases the chances of the most suitable idea to be pushed to implementation.
6406537123699.
It mitigates groupthink, prevents dominant personalities from driving the session.
6406537123700.
It eliminates the necessity for testing prototypes with real end-users.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q16

Question 17 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Which of the following statements regarding the Test phase in Karmic Design Thinking is/are valid? 1. Representative target customers should perform defined tasks in a realistic context where feasible. 2. Quantitative metrics (e.g., task completion rates) and qualitative observations (e.g., verbal reactions) should both be captured where applicable. 3. The core goal of the Test phase is to prove that the team's initial assumptions were 100% accurate without modifications. Select the correct option using the codes given below:
6406537123701.
1 only
6406537123702.
1 and 2 only
6406537123703.
2 and 3 only
6406537123704.
1, 2, and 3

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q17

Question 18 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Which of the following descriptors contains the key elements of an effective persona in the Empathize phase of Karmic Design Thinking?
6406537123705.
Rehman Dakait, a 40-year-old community leader living in Lyari neighbourhood, who frequently coordinates local activities and is widely regarded as influential and decisive.
6406537123706.
Ajay Sanyal, a 48-year-old intelligence officer based in Delhi, who approaches complex assignments cautiously, values discipline, and works closely with field operatives.
6406537123707.
Hamza Ali Mazari, a 32-year-old waiter living in Lyari neighbourhood, who cautiously builds relationships, needs stable employment and social acceptance, and aims to achieve financial security.
6406537123708.
S. P. Chaudhary, a 45-year-old police officer, known for remaining composed during difficult situations.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q18

Question 19 MCQ · 1.0 marks

A car dashboard displays a small fuel pump icon with an arrow pointing to the right, indicating which side of the vehicle houses the fuel cap. According to Don Norman, this design feature relies primarily on:
6406537123709.
Knowledge in the head
6406537123710.
Knowledge in the world
6406537123711.
Procedural knowledge stored in long-term memory
6406537123712.
Natural physical constraints

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q19

Question 20 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Expert users of professional software like Photoshop often rely on complex multi-key command sequences (e.g., Ctrl + Shift + Alt + V) rather than navigating visible menu items. Which statement best characterizes this interaction pattern?
6406537123713.
Knowledge in the world
6406537123714.
Knowledge in the head
6406537123715.
Information communicated through external signifiers
6406537123716.
Direct physical affordances

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q20

Question 21 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Who developed TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) as a systematic methodology for innovation?
6406537123717.
Don Norman
6406537123718.
Karl Ulrich
6406537123719.
Genrich Altshuller
6406537123720.
Bala Ramadurai

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q21

Question 22 MCQ · 1.0 marks

Which of the following digital app scenarios best illustrates the TRIZ principle of Preliminary Action?
6406537123721.
A navigation app automatically pre-downloading offline map data for a route while connected to Wi-Fi prior to a scheduled highway trip.
6406537123722.
A music streaming app changing its color scheme based on the artwork of the currently playing album.
6406537123723.
A photo editing app allowing users to manually adjust brightness and contrast after capturing a picture.
6406537123724.
A food delivery app showing popular restaurants nearby based on the user's current GPS location.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q22

Question 23 MCQ · 2.0 marks

Answer the given subquestions from **23 to 27** based on the scenario given below: Case Study: AssistAI AssistAI is a technology startup developing an AI-powered customer-support system for e- commerce platforms. The system includes a chatbot for customers and an AI-assisted dashboard that helps support agents identify suitable resolutions and automate repetitive tasks. Although the system was initially adopted by several e-commerce clients, recent data show a decline in chatbot usage and customer satisfaction. Support agents also report that the system’s recommendations are not always useful during complex customer interactions. The startup has engaged you to identify the causes of low adoption and recommend improvements.
[AssistAI] Which of the following would be the most appropriate first step for understanding the needs and experiences of the system’s key users?
6406537123725.
Conduct an internal workshop with the project team and prepare a journey map based on their assumptions.
6406537123726.
Interview e-commerce managers and map only the organization’s customer- support workflow.
6406537123727.
Interview customers using the chatbot and support agents working with the system, and map their respective journeys.
6406537123728.
Proceed directly to root-cause analysis because the decline in satisfaction has already been identified.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q23

Question 24 MCQ · 2.0 marks

Answer the given subquestions from **23 to 27** based on the scenario given below: Case Study: AssistAI AssistAI is a technology startup developing an AI-powered customer-support system for e- commerce platforms. The system includes a chatbot for customers and an AI-assisted dashboard that helps support agents identify suitable resolutions and automate repetitive tasks. Although the system was initially adopted by several e-commerce clients, recent data show a decline in chatbot usage and customer satisfaction. Support agents also report that the system’s recommendations are not always useful during complex customer interactions. The startup has engaged you to identify the causes of low adoption and recommend improvements.
[AssistAI] During the Analyze phase, which combination of tools would be most appropriate for identifying the underlying causes of low adoption and framing the major contradictions in the system?
6406537123729.
Multi-How analysis and emotional-mapping techniques
6406537123730.
Multi-Why analysis and the contradictions-of-ideas analysis
6406537123731.
Multi-Why analysis and the ENV model
6406537123732.
TRIZ contradiction principles and usability testing

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q24

Question 25 MCQ · 2.0 marks

Answer the given subquestions from **23 to 27** based on the scenario given below: Case Study: AssistAI AssistAI is a technology startup developing an AI-powered customer-support system for e- commerce platforms. The system includes a chatbot for customers and an AI-assisted dashboard that helps support agents identify suitable resolutions and automate repetitive tasks. Although the system was initially adopted by several e-commerce clients, recent data show a decline in chatbot usage and customer satisfaction. Support agents also report that the system’s recommendations are not always useful during complex customer interactions. The startup has engaged you to identify the causes of low adoption and recommend improvements.
[AssistAI] Following the analysis in previous question 24, after identifying the root causes and framing the major contradictions, what should the team do next in the Analyze phase?
6406537123733.
Select the most technically feasible solution and begin developing a prototype.
6406537123734.
Define the desired result for customers and support agents.
6406537123735.
Conduct silent brainstorming to generate a wide range of possible solution ideas.
6406537123736.
Apply Multi-Why technique to generate ideas for both customers and support agents.

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q25

Question 26 MCQ · 2.0 marks

Answer the given subquestions from **23 to 27** based on the scenario given below: Case Study: AssistAI AssistAI is a technology startup developing an AI-powered customer-support system for e- commerce platforms. The system includes a chatbot for customers and an AI-assisted dashboard that helps support agents identify suitable resolutions and automate repetitive tasks. Although the system was initially adopted by several e-commerce clients, recent data show a decline in chatbot usage and customer satisfaction. Support agents also report that the system’s recommendations are not always useful during complex customer interactions. The startup has engaged you to identify the causes of low adoption and recommend improvements.
[AssistAI] Following the analysis in previous question 25, which activity is most appropriate during the initial divergent stage of the Solve phase?
6406537123737.
Constructing another ENV model
6406537123738.
Conducting silent brainstorming to generate a wide range of possible solutions
6406537123739.
Building a functional prototype of the preferred solution
6406537123740.
Testing the ten highest-ranked solutions with all existing customers

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q26

Question 27 MCQ · 2.0 marks

Answer the given subquestions from **23 to 27** based on the scenario given below: Case Study: AssistAI AssistAI is a technology startup developing an AI-powered customer-support system for e- commerce platforms. The system includes a chatbot for customers and an AI-assisted dashboard that helps support agents identify suitable resolutions and automate repetitive tasks. Although the system was initially adopted by several e-commerce clients, recent data show a decline in chatbot usage and customer satisfaction. Support agents also report that the system’s recommendations are not always useful during complex customer interactions. The startup has engaged you to identify the causes of low adoption and recommend improvements.
[AssistAI] Following the Solve phase, the team proposes two possible improvements: 1. Enhance the chatbot’s natural-language processing capability to interpret customer intent more accurately. 2. Develop a customizable dashboard that enables support agents to monitor and modify chatbot recommendations. However, both solutions would require major infrastructural changes and substantial investment before they could be tested.  What should the team do next?
6406537123741.
Apply a systematic inventive problem-solving approach and resolve the underlying contradictions
6406537123742.
Develop full-scale versions of both solutions and test them with a customer sample
6406537123743.
Estimate the total implementation cost and select whichever solution is less expensive
6406537123744.
Conducting a voting session among the developers to finalize the solution for implementation

A published solution is not available for this question yet.

Report a correction for Q27